Magdalina Kalincheva M.D. VINE ST, STOCKTON CA, ANSWER TO ILLEGAL MURDER ACT 39201200275450CLUDSTK; & CASE 244725 A8, AFFIDAVIT 8, 01-22-12

ANSWER REQUESTS: 1. TO DISMISS AS: FALSE & DOES NOT APPLY TO ME & MY STOLEN PROPERTY, ILLEGAL; 2. CROSS COMPLAINT: MY STOLEN DEEDS, MY STOLEN PROPERTY, MY STOLEN LIFE 20 YEARS; 3. TO ORDER JESSE TO MAIL ME MY TWO STOLEN DEEDS NOW. 4. CONTINUANCE - UNTIL I GET A LAWYER & FINACIAL AID;

A8 REQUESTS: 5. TO CONSIDER I-134, AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT JESSE FILED WITH US GOV INS FOR ME IN 1991 SEPARATELY FROM OUR MARRIAGE - INS IS A GUARANTOR THAT I WILL NEVER BE A PUBLIC CHARGE; 2. TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR JAN 06-2012 WHEN JESSE DID NOT ATTEND & TO GRANT ALL REQUESTED SINCE JAN 2010, 3. MY STOLEN DEED NOW; 4. TO GRANT NEW TRIAL; 5. ATTORNEY’S FEES. 6. TO ORDER JESSE TO PROVIDE CELL PHONE, LAPTOP COMPUTER, ISP FOR ME.

ANSWER - REQUESTS: 1. TO DISMISS: IT IS FALSE, FRAUD ILLEGAL MURDER ACT BECAUSE: I AM NOT A TENANT, NEVER WAS. I AM THE RIGHTFUL OWNER. 543 W VINE ST IS FAMILY’S DOMICILE HOUSE WHICH IS COMMUNITY PROPERTY BY DEVISE. PROOFS: I HAVE MARRIAGE AND BIRTH CERTIFICATES, I-134 AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT WITH US GOV INS DOCUMENTS. ONE HALF IS MINE FROM 1991 I ACQUIRED BY DEVISE, WITH COMPOUNDED INTEREST FOR 20 YEARS IT IS 100% MINE NOW - SEE COMPONDED INTEREST CALCULATOR. THE DEED IS STOLEN FROM ME=MY STOLEN PROPERTY. JESSE IS NOT A LANDLORD - NEVER WAS, HE KNOWS HE STOLE MY TWO DEEDS & EVERYTHING FROM ME. “DIVORCE” PAPERS FROM 1992 ARE MANIFESTLY UNJUST VIOLATING ALL MARRIAGE COMMUNITY PROPERTY AND COMMON LAWS SUCH AS MEL GIBSON-OKSANA CASE. ARE THE OPOSITE OF RENTAL AGREEMENT. CANNOT BE USED AS PROOF TO REPLACE A RENTAL AGREEMENT which is required to file ud-100 - SEE BELOW. UD-100 DOES NOT APPLY TO ME TO US AT ALL. THEREFORE I REQUESTED A NEW DISSOLUTION TRIAL. 2. CROSS COMPLAINT: - MY TWO STOLEN DEEDS, MY STOLEN PROPERTY AND SETTLEMENT, AND MY STOLEN LIFE 20 YEARS LIKE JAYCEE DUGARD CASE. - TO ORDER JESSE TO MAIL ME MY TWO STOLEN DEEDS NOW. PROOFS ARE THE FOLLOWING FACTS:

1. RENTAL AGREEMENT: - DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER EXISTED;

- WAS NEVER FILED WITH UD-100, NEVER SERVED TO ME EITHER;

- IS REQUIRED TO FILE THE UNLAWFUL DETAINER COMPLAINT FORM UD-100. BUT IT DOES NOT EXIST, NEVER EXISTED. THEREFORE UD-100 CANNOT BE FILED. THE FILING HAD TO BE DENIED BY THE CIVIL COURT. UD-100 DOES NOT APPLY TO ME.

- RENTAL AGREEMENT CANNOT BE REPLACED IN ANY WAY BY MANIFESTLY UNJUST ILLEGAL “DIVORCE” PAPERS OR MY STOLEN DEEDS JESSE IS USING. THESE ARE TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS AND TWO OPOSITE THINGS. 

- POINT SIX 6 a. (1) OF IT IS ALL LIES & FRAUD: THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 9, 2012 I WAS STAYING IN THE HOUSE WITH JESSE’S AGREEMENT AND JESSE WAS STAYING HERE.

- POINT SIX 6 f. (1) IS FRAUD-LIE: THERE IS NO RENTAL AGREEMENT, NEVER WAS, NEVER EXISTED, NEVER WILL BE. RENTING WAS NEVER AN OPTION FOR ME - I NEVER HAD INCOME SOURCE TO RENT, MOST APARTMENT MANAGERS REFUSED TO RENT ME FOR THIS REASON, DESCRIBED IN DETAIL AND PROVED BEFORE. 

- COMMUNITY PROPERTY LAWS, I-134 AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAWS, AND COMMON LAWS LIKE MEL GIBSON-OKSANA CASE HAD TO BE & HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED AND APPLIED.

- WHY WERE THEY ALLOWED TO FILE ILLEGAL COMPLAINT UD-100 WITHOUT A RENTAL AGREEMENT WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT TO FILE IT?

- TO CONSIDER 5. I-134 AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT SEE ATTACHED WHICH GUARANTEES THAT I WILL NEVER BE A PUBLIC CHARGE OF ANY KIND AND SEPARATELY FROM OUR MARRIAGE: I CANNOT BE HOMELESS, CANNOT BE ON WELFARE, CANNOT BE ON PUBLIC ASSITANCE OF ANY KIND WAS NOT USED AT ALL IN 1992 “DIVORCE” - IT IS NOT AT ALL IN THE PAPERS FROM 1992, WAS NEVER USED ACTUALLY. NOW I REMEMBER THAT MY ATTORNEY IRVING CORREN TOLD ME THAT HE “DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP” AND SENT ME FOR IT TO JOHN CHOW WITH WHICH I HAD TWO HOURS CONSULTATION AND PAID HIM $900 FOR IT - IT WAS $450 PER HOUR x2=$900 - I KEEP THE RECEIPTS I WILL SUBMIT THEM AS PROOFS. I HAD TO USE TAXI CAB SO TOTAL I PAID $1000 FOR THESE TWO HOURS CONSULTATION=GENERAL TALKING. HE DID NOT TELL ME ANYTHING I DID NOT KNOW BEFORE, DID NOT TELL ME ANYTHING SPECIFIC, I HAD NO PROBLEM THEN, AND IT WAS TOO EXPENSIVE CONSIDERING THAT I CANNOT WORK HERE AS A DOCTOR, THE DIVORCE, I HAD NO MONEY IN THE BANK EITHER BUT WAS FORCED TO RENT VERY EXPENSIVE & UNEMPLOYED, I COULD NOT AFFORD TO VISIT HIM MORE AND JUST FOR GENERAL TALKING, SO DID NOT VISIT ANYMORE. HE DID NOT DO ANYTHING FOR ME FOR THESE $900 - $1000 I SPENT - IT WAS ONLY GENERAL TALKING. NOW AGAIN I TRIED TO FILE I-134 WITH THE FAMILY COURT 1-24-2012 AS PROOF BUT THEY DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT, “IT IS NOT THEIR FORM” - THE CLERK SAID, AND DO NOT WANT TO KNOW ABOUT IT, REFUSED TO FILE IT WITH MY OTHER AFFIDAVITS WHICH WERE DENIED. SO THE JUDGE STILL DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT IT EITHER. ROBERT FROM INPROPER TOLD ME TO FILE EVERYTHING WITH “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” FORMS, NOT JUST WITH MC-030 BUT IT WAS DENIED & THE JUDGE DID NOT GIVE ANOTHER HEARING DATE. I THINK ALL YOUR LAWYERS AND JUDGES MUST KNOW IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP LAWS & RULES TOO OR TO BE WILLING TO RESEARCH THEM, TO CONSIDER THEM AND RESPECT THEM, TO ADD THEM, TO INCLUDE THEM IN CASE OF DIVORCE. IRVING CORREN DID NOT DO THIS. AND I-134 WAS NEVER USED FOR ME. MY LIFE IS STOLEN AS A RESULT, NOW AGAIN MY LIFE AND MY FUTURE IS STOLEN LIKE IN 1992 - JESSE KNOWINGLY & INTENTIONALLY DESTROYED/DAMAGED/STOLE EVERYTHING I HAD FOR 21 YEARS. JESSE KNOWINGLY & INTENTIONALLY DESTROYED I-134 FORM TOO, NEVER GAVE IT TO ME TO CONTROL ABUSE & MURDER ME LIKE CHARLES MANSON. THEN CREATED THROUGHT THE YEARS MANY FINACIALLY BAD SITUATIONS FOR ME LEAVING ME EVERHYWHERE IN HOTELS, APARTMENTS ETC. WITHOUT ANY MONEY AND WAS CALLING POLICE I TO LOOK BAD TO POLICE WHEN HE IS GUILTY FOR HIS SADISTIC GRATIFICATION LIKE CHARLES MANSON. ATTORNEY’S FEES WERE ORDERED IN 1992 AND JESSE TOLD ME HE PAID CORREN $5000. BUT CORREN WANTED I TO PAY HIM TOO AND I PAID HIM TWICE x $2500=$5000 TOTAL. OR I PAID TOTAL TO BOTH LAWYERS OVER $6000 WITH TAXI CAB I HAD TO USE IN 1992. AND IRVING CORREN DID MOSTLY THE RESTRAINING ORDER ONLY. NEVER ASKED ME WHAT I WANT. NOTHING WAS NEGOTIATED WITH ME: NOTHING PROPERTY, NOTHING CAR, NOTHING FINANCIAL WHICH WAS CRUCIAL TO DO IN 1992, DID NOT DO DIVISION OF PROPERTY.

- FURTHER TO CONSIDER A6 AFFIDAVIT 6 FILED WITH FAMILY COURT: I AM UNABLE TO LEAVE FAMILY’S DOMICILE MY STOLEN HOUSE, THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION FOR ME. JESSE IS GUILTY THAT I AM FINANCIALLY BROKE, GUILTY OF GRAND THEFTS RAPES AND MURDER SETUP, ATTEMPTS.

- AND TO CONSIDER AND APPLY COMMON LAWS LIKE MEL GIBSON-OKSANA CASE: THEY WERE NEVER MARRIED, BUT OKSANA NEVER LEFT MEL’S HOUSE, GOT SETTLEMENT FOR LIFE, GOT EVERYTHING SHE WANTED BASED ON AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT ALONE. NO MARRIAGE WAS REQUIRED FOR HER.

- IT IS NON-JURISDICTIONAL: THIS COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IS FAMILY LAW COURT AND AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT I-134 SPONSORSHIP CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION LAWS - SEE ATTACHED.

I ASK THE COURT TO CONSIDER ALL FILED PAPERS ALL FACTS AND POINTS: SEVEN AFFIDAVITS AND DOCUMENTS-PROOFS I-134 AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT SPONSORSHIP AND TO APPLY THE COMMON LAWS LIKE MEL GIBSON-OKSANA CASE: MEL GIBSON AND OKSANA WERE NEVER MARRIED. BUT SHE NEVER LEFT MEL’S HOUSE, WAS NEVER ASKED TO LEAVE MEL’S HOUSE. THERE WAS NEVER ANY ATTEMPT TO “REMOVE” HER WHICH IS MURDER WHEN THE WOMAN IS FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY AND HAS NO OTHER OPTIONS. JESSE OWES ME $500000000 FOR MURDER ATTEMPTS PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE WHICH CANNOT BE DENIED TO ME. JESSE IS THE PERSON WHO IMPORTED ME TO LIVE HERE PERMANENTLY AND NOT TO WORK IF I MARRY HIM CAN AFFORD AND FILED ALL AND AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT I NEVER TO BE A PUBLIC CHARGE OF ANY KIND. HE HAD TO PROVIDE PERMANENT HOUSING CAR INCOME SOURCES FOR ME AND FROM 1992 SUCH AS I TO OWN REAL ESTATE, CAR, INCOME SOURCES TO BE POSSIBLE TO LIVE HERE AND TO HAVE A NORMAL LIFE, TO BE SAFE, NOT ON WELFARE. RENTING WAS NEVER AN OPTION FOR ME - THEY NEVER CREATED INCOME SOURCE FOR ME, DESCRIBED AND PROVED BEFORE, CAUSED MY STOLEN LIFE AND STOLEN FUTURE LIKE JAYCEED CASE. JESSE KNOWS HE STOLE BOTH DEEDS FROM ME AND THE BIGGER PART OF MY CASH SETTLEMENT BY A MANIFESTLY UNJUST “DIVORCE” FRAUD IN 1992 IN WHICH I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE AT ALL. THERE WERE NO COMPUTERS THEN, NO PRINTER, NO COPIER AT HOME, NO CAR - I WAS UNABLE TO DO ANYTHING WITHOUT HOME, CAR, INCOME SOURCES, OFFICE AND FROM THE RENTAL, UNABLE TO FIGHT ILLEGAL EVICTION MURDER ACTS THEREFORE. MY ATTORNEY IRVIN CORREN TOLD ME I CAN MODIFY ANYTIME BUT I COULD NOT AFFORD TO PAY ANYTHING SCARED AND WORRYING DEATH THAT MONEY WILL FINISH AND I WOULD BE MURDERED. ALSO, I DID NOT LIKE WHAT HE DID IN 1992 NEVER ADDED NEVER CONSIDERED AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT WHICH WAS CRUCIAL THEN. WHAT WAS PAID TO ME WAS STOLEN BY WRONGFUL AND UNJUST ILLEGAL RENTING IN THEIR INTEREST ONLY AGAINST MY INTEREST AND WILL WHICH MUST BE FULLY REFUNDED TO ME IN A NEW TRIAL. TO ORDER JESSE TO MAIL ME MY STOLEN HOUSE DEED NOW, TO CONTINUE TO PAY THE SAME UTILITIES UNTIL CREATING INCOME SOURCES FOR ME SUCH AS I TO BUY TO OWN A RENTAL DULPLEX AND I TO RECEIVE RENTAL INCOME. FURTHER ORDERS: TO DISMISS ILLEGAL ACTS 39201200275450CLUDSTK, 39201200275450CLUDSTK AND FALSE ACCUSATION SM279031A.

- EVERYTHING WAS FRAUD WITH JESSE, RAPES, GRAND THEFTS, MURDERS, FRAUD AGAIN NOW - MANY PROOFS FOR IT FILED. http://www.glenncourt.ca.gov/court_info/landlord.html (Because of its summary character, an unlawful detainer action is not a suitable vehicle for trying complicated ownership issues involving allegations of fraud.)

A8 - OTHER ORDERS - REQUESTS: 2. - DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON JAN 06, 2012 AND TO GRANT ALL REQUESTED SINCE JAN 28, 2010. - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CONTINUED FROM A7 POINT 2: REQUEST FOR A NEW TRIAL - FRAUD GRAND THEFTS AND MURDER SETUP: THE FRAUD STARTED FROM HIS LETTERS EVEN BEFORE OUR MARRIAGE LYING THAT HIS TWIN BROTHER AND MOTHER ARE MARRIED - PROOF SEE HIS ORIGINAL LETTERS FILED. WHEN I CAME HERE MARRIED THEREFORE TOO LATE NOT TO MARRY HIM, THEY TOLD ME THAT BARBARA AND JEFF WERE TWICE DIVORCED WITH A CHILD, AND HIS MOTHER WAS DIVORCED BEFORE TO REMARRY THEIR FATHER. I WOULD NOT MARRY HIM IF I KNEW THAT THERE WERE DIVORCES IN HIS FAMILY. NOT TO HAVE DIVORCE IN HIS FAMILY WAS MY FIRST AND BIGGEST REQUIREMENT AS I DID NOT HAVE ANY DIVORCES IN MY FAMILY, AND MY COUNTRY HAD VERY LOW RATE 1% TOO.

FRAUD GRAND THEFTS AND MURDER SETUP STARTED AGAIN SHORTLY AFTER I ARRIVED HERE MARRIED 1991 WHEN JESSE MADE THE TRANSFER OF THE LAND DEED AND PRESSURED ME TO SIGN TO GRANT THE LAND TO HIM. BUT STILL THE CONDITION WAS THAT WE WILL BE MARRIED FOR LIFE I TO BE SAFE AND I WILL BE SAFE IF I AM MARRIED I THOUGHT. I MUST BE SAFE. I WAS ASKING MYSELF WHY DOES HE WANT THE LAND IF HE WILL BE MARRIED TO ME FOREVER? ARTHYR THOMPSON WAS ALSO MARRIED BUT SHARED THE LAND WITH HIS WIFE ONLY. IF JESSE HAD A CRIMINAL INTENT TO DIVORCE ME HE MUST RETURN THE LAND DEED TO ME I DO NOT GRANT BECAUSE I MUST OWN REAL ESTATE CAR AND INCOME SOURCES TO BE POSSIBLE TO LIVE HERE AND TO BE SAFE. HE HAD TO MAKE ME SAFE WHEN HE CAN AFFORD IT FROM 1991 - SEE TAX RETURNS $291000 PER YEAR SALARY, AGI $261222 IN 1991 FILED, AND ALSO “MUCH MONEY IN THE BANK” HIS ORIGINAL LETTERS TO ME. BOTH EVIDENCES WERE FILED WITH THE FAMILY COURT. I MUST BE SAFE IF DIVORCED AND THERE IS NO OTHER HELP FOR ME, NO OTHER OPTIONS LIKE LOCAL WOMEN HAVE BUT THE PERSON WHO IMPORTED ME HERE LIKE MEL GIBSON-OKSANA CASE. I MUST OWN REAL ESTATE, CAR, INCOME SOURCES SUCH AS RENTAL INCOME TO BE CREATED FOR ME TO BE POSSIBLE TO LIVE HERE ON A FIRST PLACE.

FRAUD - RAPES WHILE MARRIED: I WAS VIRGIN, SAVING MYSELF FOR TRUE LOVE AND FOREVER MARRIAGE LIKE MY PARENTS, GRANDPARENTS AND MOST NORMAL PEOPLE HAVE. IF JESSE HAD CRIMINAL INTENT TO DIVORCE ME, HE HAD NO PERMISSION.

FRAUD - THE MURDER SETUP: IT WAS SETUP BY RITA SPOHN, KAREN HULL THE OWNER OF THE DUPLEX 1814 CONCORD AVE IN THEIR INTERST ONLY AGAINST MY INTEREST AND WILL. I HAD NO OTHER CHOICE THEN. - TO BE CONTINUED…;

FRAUD-STOLEN LIFE AGAIN: JESSE INSISTED I TO STUDY FOR NURSES ASSISTANT TO TAKE CARE OF PARENTS ONE DAY WHICH TOOK TWO YEARS FROM MY LIFE. I WAS HOPING PARENTS TO BUY ME A HOUSE AND DUPLEX FOR RENTAL INCOME THEN, WE ALL WILL LIVE THERE IN THIS HOUSE AND THE RENTAL WILL SUPPORT US ALL, TO MAKE ME FINANCIALLY INDEPENDENT TO TAKE CARE OF THEM AND THAT I WILL LIVE WITH THEM BOTH BUT WILL BE INDEPENDENT FROM JESSE. BUT RECENTLY THEY KILLED THIS OPTION FOR ME. NOW HIS FATHER IS PAYNIG $2500+UTILIES=$3000/MONTH RENT TO STRANGERS, AND PRESSURING JESSE TO MURDER ME INSTEAD - HE HAS NO DECENCY THAT MOST OLD PEOPLE HAVE, HE NEVER HAD ANY DECENCY, NEVER TAUGHT JESSE TO RESPECT HIMSELF, OLD PEOPLE AND WOMEN.

THE LAND DEED WITH COMPOUND INTEREST FOR 20 YEARS MUST BE RETURNED TO ME BECAUSE I MUST BE POSSIBLE TO LIVE HERE AND SAFE IN CASE OF DIVORCE - I DO NOT GRANT. I WOULD TRADE IT FOR A NEW DUPLEX I TO RECEIVE RENTAL INCOME. IT HAD TO BE DONE IN 1992.

A7 POINT 3. PROOF: I WILL BRING TERMITES ON HEARING AS PROOF OF HOUSE CONDITION - THEY ARE INSIDE IN THE KITCHEN: DRYWOOD, WINGED TERMITES, SWARMERS, HAVE WINGS AND FLY. I DO NOT WANT TO USE ANY CHEMICALS - PLEASE DO NOT USE ANY CHEMICALS.

Thank you very much!

IT IS NOT THE SAME - I AM SUBMITTING DIFFERENT ESSAY AFFIDAVITS WITH EACH FORM FL-300 “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” AS INPROPER TOLD ME TO BE CONSIDERED.